From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
From: "Douglas A. Gwyn" <DAGwyn@null.net>
Message-ID: <3B8E43DB.A4C7BB13@null.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <3b87fb54@news.bezeqint.net>
Subject: [9fans] Re: EROS, Vapour
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 15:57:10 +0000
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e7da3b80-eac9-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

Eyal Lotem wrote:
> Do you think the increased backwards compatability of Plan9 is worth the
> lack of advantages such as a pure capability system, orthogonal
> persistence, and in the case of Vapour, extreme performance and utter
> safety?

Plan9 supports networking and graphics, which last I heard EROS
has yet to tackle.  The projects have substantially different
goals.

What is Vapour?