From: Bobby Dimmette <bjd@lucent.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] on the topic of viruses
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 10:23:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BB487E3.9A00AEC8@gemini.gc.lucent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010928010622.17297199E7@mail.cse.psu.edu>
System V/MLS is still being used in a few places today. It was
available on the 3B2 (we32k and mips versions) and x86 platforms. It
was certified C2 and B1. The government had a contractual requirement
for MLS, but access controls seemed like a good idea anyway. The
constraints of MLS affected usability and made it difficult to sell.
dmr@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
> Gwyn's correct, by the way, that AT&T Federal Systems
> did do System V/MLS certified to B1 or B2 or so.
> This was independent of the McIlroy and Reeds work,
> though I'm certain there was consultation.
>
> Dennis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-28 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-28 1:06 dmr
2001-09-28 9:58 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-10-01 16:13 ` permissions idea (Re: [9fans] on the topic of viruses) Matthew Hannigan
2001-10-01 16:18 ` Matthew Hannigan
2001-10-02 8:34 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-10-02 15:11 ` Matthew Hannigan
2001-10-04 18:36 ` [9fans] capability-based design (Re: permissions idea) Richard
2001-09-28 14:23 ` Bobby Dimmette [this message]
2001-09-28 18:44 ` [9fans] on the topic of viruses Boyd Roberts
2001-09-28 20:35 ` Bobby Dimmette
2001-10-01 9:55 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2001-10-01 10:40 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-10-01 9:55 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-02 2:35 dmr
2001-10-01 13:55 forsyth
2001-10-02 0:58 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-10-01 13:54 rog
2001-10-01 13:48 rob pike
2001-10-01 13:09 presotto
2001-10-01 12:09 rob pike
2001-10-01 14:10 ` Ralph Corderoy
2001-09-30 13:11 rob pike
2001-10-01 9:46 ` Digby Tarvin
2001-10-01 9:51 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-09-27 4:33 dmr
2001-09-27 11:05 ` Anthony Mandic
2001-09-30 12:51 ` Digby Tarvin
2001-09-30 13:10 ` Boyd Roberts
2001-10-01 9:56 ` Ralph Corderoy
2001-09-27 1:21 andrey mirtchovski
2001-09-27 1:22 ` Boyd Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3BB487E3.9A00AEC8@gemini.gc.lucent.com \
--to=bjd@lucent.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).