From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
From: KADOTA Kyohei <lufia@me.com>
In-reply-to: <CAEAzY38Az=_4Min2vFfXCkNez-7Wka104QiWf=FaafmnJuAAWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed,  6 May 2015 00:07:33 +0900
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Message-id: <3BBFF3C0-1AB6-46F2-86EF-E607D34F4939@me.com>
References: <87C61423-7C13-4516-88B5-C2ABA7D32AA9@me.com>
	<A1D8C0A6-BB79-42EB-9874-C3F4A8FCC1F6@9srv.net>
	<CAEAzY38Az=_4Min2vFfXCkNez-7Wka104QiWf=FaafmnJuAAWw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] fossil+venti performance question
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4efc45ba-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Thanks Aram.

> I have spent some time
> debugging this, but unfortunately, I couldn't find the root cause, and
> I just stopped using fossil.

I tried to measure performance effect by replacement of component.

1) mbr or GRUB
2) pbs or pbslba
3) sdata or sdvirtio (sdvirtio is imported from 9legacy)
4) kernel configurations (9pcf, 9pccpuf, 9pcauth, etc)

unfortunately, all of the above are no performance effect.

=E2=80=94
kadota=