From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3BCA8652.F2CC96B7@strakt.com>
From: Boyd Roberts <boyd@strakt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: Plan 9 annoyances (was: Re: [9fans] mv vs cp)
References: <200110141954.f9EJs8680612@ducky.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 08:46:42 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 088d066e-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

Mike Haertel wrote:
> i see no real reason for "mk nuke" to exist.  "mk clean" *almost* removes
> every intermediate file; why not just fix it to get them all, and then
> get rid of "mk nuke" entirely?

No, 'nuke' and 'clean' serve two different purposes.  Both are aptly named.