From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3BFAED48.DEBD9137@zip.com.au>
From: Matthew Hannigan <mlh@zip.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Private Namespaces for Linux
References: <20011120234025.2344519A47@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 00:54:48 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2653caac-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025


I don't think that that is such a bad way to
go, since linux does such a good job in hardware
support.

I'm sure that 9fans must find supporting all the
new fancy hardware out there a little tedious.

-Matt


David Gordon Hogan wrote:
>
> > > Disallowing su, passwd, sendmail, etc etc isn't really a solution...
> >
> > Sure, but there are ways to handle that.  And until it's done we need
> > restricted mount.
>
> So your solution is to gradually evolve Linux until it becomes
> Plan 9, rather than just using Plan 9?