From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu From: "Douglas A. Gwyn" Message-ID: <3C5A091B.5EE62DB0@null.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <3C57AF73.727F8CE9@null.net>, <3C58DFD7.33AFB32B@null.net>, <87d6zqsww6.fsf@becket.becket.net> Subject: Re: [OT] Re: [9fans] Getting started in Plan9 - help Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 09:57:38 +0000 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4a879fca-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" wrote: > So are there references that back up what you are saying, ... What I am saying is that if parity was *not* conserved, the theoretical analysis behind the famous experiments (on weak decay) did not demonstrate it, due to not accounting for the non-vectorial nature of the c.p. in the form of Maxwell's laws used in the analysis. I have my own reasons to think that mirror symmetry *has* to be a fundamental property of physics and that any asymmetry is environmentally induced.