From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3C5E746A.A5EA4630@strakt.com>
From: Boyd Roberts <boyd@strakt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Virtual memory & paging
References: <20020204103944.36F5419A27@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon,  4 Feb 2002 12:45:46 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4b3f5f0c-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

geoff@collyer.net wrote:
> Given that degree of sharing, the low cost of RAM, and the increase in
> OS complexity, slowness and insecurity in the implementations of
> dynamic libraries that I've seen, I don't see a need for dynamic
> libraries.

Oh, if it comes to DLLs, those things are 'orrible; every 'process'
shares the DLL's data segment.  That's one reason why it is impossible
to write a correct windows program.