From: Boyd Roberts <boyd@strakt.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] XP (was: code complexity)
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 18:49:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C601B33.DB8558E6@strakt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50F591D39557D511B12C0090274DCEBC03E588D7@noanet03.noanet.nttdata.co.jp>
iwanek@nttdata.co.jp wrote:
>
> On a related topic, what does people on this list think of
> Extreme Programming (XP)?
I think it's the bleeding obvious that's turned into a religion.
> Is anyone practicing XP?
We do, but not to the point of zealotry.
> Does it help at all to reduce code complexity?
Yes, 'cos someone will say:
Why did you write that complex junk?
Or the complex junk never gets written in the first place [pair programming].
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-05 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-05 17:40 iwanek
2002-02-05 17:49 ` Boyd Roberts [this message]
2002-02-06 20:15 ` Laura Creighton
2002-02-06 23:04 ` Steve Kilbane
2002-02-06 0:10 geoff
2002-02-06 10:42 ` Boyd Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C601B33.DB8558E6@strakt.com \
--to=boyd@strakt.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).