From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3D2480B0.C7DF176B@gsyc.escet.urjc.es>
From: FJ Ballesteros <nemo@gsyc.escet.urjc.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] blanks in names
References: <20020704164128.8041219988@mail.cse.psu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu,  4 Jul 2002 19:06:56 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c206c3a0-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

If that's what we end up doing there is a "visible space" rune.

Although, this afternoon I'm more in the mood of not eating worms
and try to get the blank handled (still waiting for answers to my
last post :-) ).



rog@vitanuova.com ha escrito:
> 
> > Fix those that do by relabeling as Nemo suggests, although please not
> > with a variant invisible blank.  Something visible but rarely used,
> > such as the 0x80 rune.
> 
> try typing it... :-)
> 
> i agree that it should be visible; but i also think it should be
> visually distinguishable as a "spacer" character (i.e.  not a peter face)