From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3D35045E.1090000@cox.net>
From: GBA <avil.ss@cox.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020508 Netscape6/6.2.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] New language?
References: <000501c22cee$2608e170$bf356887@bl.belllabs.com> <Pine.LNX.4.30.0207161302390.14125-100000@athena>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 22:45:02 -0700
Topicbox-Message-UUID: ce885116-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025



Don't know much about Limbo, but have you seen this?

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html


> Too true.  What then, a new language based on C pulling the
> yummy stuff out of limbo?  One that's not interpreted, without
> a garbage collector, and no atend >:), but that has tuples, array bounds
> checking, etc?  At this point should we just considering loosening up
> Oberon a little and making a few additions?
> 
> I'd be willing to help so long as we fix the BCPL inherited '&'
> precedence.
> 
> Sam
> 
>