9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Douglas A. Gwyn" <DAGwyn@null.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Ephase question.
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:42:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D59BCAD.A375959A@null.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c6fdef3d69eacb9ea0f5bc6e8d80566b@plan9.bell-labs.com>

Russ Cox wrote:
> I don't know.  Plan 9 has 48 system calls these days,
> 10 of which are deprecated.  So 38.  That's still a lot.

It would be an interesting academic exercise to determine the
minimal set.  E.g. close() doesn't seem to be needed; whenever
there's no reference to the object, any connection to it can be
cleaned up.  At least for Unix devices, it was only the *last*
close that did anything interesting.  And I've sometimes had
the feeling that bind and mount aren't dissimilar enough to
require separation.  The trick is to combine function in some
natural way, not merely tunnel through the syscall port then
expand again on the other side.

Would it be possible for a 9P-like system to make all service
calls just access a server within the protocol?  E.g., instead
of open() there would be a channel that handles 9P-open packets
(as well as other 9P packets).  (Apologies if I've garbled the
details; the general idea is all I'm wondering about.)


  reply	other threads:[~2002-08-14  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-08-13 15:59 Russ Cox
2002-08-14  8:42 ` Douglas A. Gwyn [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-14 14:12 Russ Cox
2002-08-14 13:19 rob pike, esq.
2002-08-15  8:59 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2002-08-15 16:22   ` Ronald G Minnich
2002-08-13 23:49 rog
2002-08-13 17:28 Russ Cox
2002-08-13 17:01 rob pike, esq.
2002-08-13 16:37 anothy
2002-08-13 15:57 Russ Cox
2002-08-13 15:43 rob pike, esq.
2002-08-13 13:13 rog
2002-08-13 12:16 presotto
2002-08-13 15:53 ` Ronald G Minnich
2002-08-13 11:43 David Gordon Hogan
2002-08-13 15:45 ` Ronald G Minnich
2002-08-13  6:17 Charles Forsyth
     [not found] <rsc@plan9.bell-labs.com>
2002-08-13  5:42 ` Russ Cox
2002-08-13  5:53   ` Scott Schwartz
2002-08-13  6:05   ` Ronald G Minnich
2002-08-13  6:22     ` Alexander Viro
2002-08-13  6:13   ` Alexander Viro
2002-08-13  4:20 Russ Cox
2002-08-13  3:37 rob pike, esq.
2002-08-13  9:31 ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2002-08-13  3:33 presotto
2002-08-13  4:10 ` Alexander Viro
2002-08-13  5:39 ` Ronald G Minnich
2002-08-19 16:23   ` Boyd Roberts
2002-08-13  6:46 ` Andrew Lynch
2002-08-13 22:07 ` Roman V. Shaposhnick
2002-08-13  3:31 Russ Cox
2002-08-13  1:39 presotto
2002-08-13  3:14 ` Roman V. Shaposhnick
2002-08-13  1:26 Roman V. Shaposhnick

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3D59BCAD.A375959A@null.net \
    --to=dagwyn@null.net \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).