From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3D8C96DE.5040600@nas.com>
From: Jack Johnson <fragment@nas.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9 in the news
References: <000701c26112$c24e6b60$6501a8c0@KIKE> <20020921131623.H22351@cackle.proxima.alt.za>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 08:57:18 -0700
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f1b51598-eaca-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

Lucio De Re wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 03:01:09AM +0100, matt wrote:
>>http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/09/20/1532208&mode=nested&tid=156
>>
> Is it just me, or were the responses surprisingly uninformed?

I'm less informed than I should be, and I felt the same way.

I was unimpressed by the LinuxWorld article in general, but yes,
Slashdot isn't what it used to be.

-Jack