* Re: [9fans] 9 in the news
@ 2002-09-21 15:35 rob pike, esq.
2002-09-21 16:33 ` Jack Johnson
2002-09-22 22:22 ` Dan Cross
0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rob pike, esq. @ 2002-09-21 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> Slashdot isn't what it used to be.
It never was.
-rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] 9 in the news
2002-09-21 15:35 [9fans] 9 in the news rob pike, esq.
@ 2002-09-21 16:33 ` Jack Johnson
2002-09-21 17:17 ` matt
2002-09-22 22:22 ` Dan Cross
1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Jack Johnson @ 2002-09-21 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
rob pike, esq. wrote:
>>Slashdot isn't what it used to be.
>
> It never was.
True, but I think when it was less popular I think it was easier to
start a semi-rational discussion. Now, with 200+ comments on every
story, you really have to want to look if you want to find an
interesting idea in the flotsam.
Conversely, I think Usenet is returning to its roots because of it's
lack of popularity in the face of the Web, and Google's archives make it
that much more useful.
-Jack
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] 9 in the news
2002-09-21 15:35 [9fans] 9 in the news rob pike, esq.
2002-09-21 16:33 ` Jack Johnson
@ 2002-09-22 22:22 ` Dan Cross
1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Dan Cross @ 2002-09-22 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Amen.
- Dan C.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] 9 in the news
@ 2002-09-23 14:38 Anssi Porttikivi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Anssi Porttikivi @ 2002-09-23 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
I think reading Slashdot responses at quality thresold 4/5, like I do, is fairly nice. From that filtering perspective I see the quality of comments and relevance of issues as better than most of computer journalism. Of course, your own inner circle of gurus always knows better...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] 9 in the news
@ 2002-09-21 20:28 Geoff Collyer
2002-09-23 14:13 ` Peter Downs
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Geoff Collyer @ 2002-09-21 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
netnews becoming useful again? surely this is a sign of the end
times.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] 9 in the news
2002-09-21 20:28 Geoff Collyer
@ 2002-09-23 14:13 ` Peter Downs
2002-09-23 16:00 ` Jack Johnson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Peter Downs @ 2002-09-23 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
A good rule of thumb is that one out of every ten people is not a complete moron.
One person may be able to keep a discussion under control with 9 morons
in the room, but could 10 control a conversation with 90 morons hanging around?
You can see it's a non-linear relationship.
How many users are on slashdot now? You'll see the quality degrade anywhere there
is a huge userbase.
Even bad PR can be good, though. And anyone with half a mind to be able to find
the plan9 web site, should find it's content informative.
-peter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] 9 in the news
@ 2002-09-21 14:52 Russ Cox
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Russ Cox @ 2002-09-21 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> Is it just me, or were the responses surprisingly uninformed?
It's hard to be surprised at the uninformedness of
a Slashdot discussion. Still, it was impressive to
me that no one understood what single sign-on
really meant. Everyone had the Microsoft version
stuck in their heads.
Russ
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] 9 in the news
@ 2002-09-21 14:39 anothy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: anothy @ 2002-09-21 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
// Is it just me, or were the responses surprisingly uninformed?
well, given that it's slashdot, i'm impressed by how well-reasoned
and rational the whole thing's been! and the article itself isn't
exactly stellar writing: AT&T Bell Labs? c'mon, guys... that was
an okay mistake to make in '97. and the article vaugely says the
ideas in plan 9 will defeat passport, but doesn't really say
anything about how. oh, Sun or Linux will pick 'em up and do
something great with them. because he says so.
okay.
ア
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [9fans] 9 in the news
@ 2002-09-21 2:01 matt
2002-09-21 11:16 ` Lucio De Re
2002-10-01 12:45 ` matt
0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: matt @ 2002-09-21 2:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
How Apache & Plan 9 will defeat Microsoft's Passport
http://www.linuxworld.com/site-stories/2002/0918.plan9.html
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/09/20/1532208&mode=nested&tid=156
---
Outgoing mail is certified as idiotic.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.384 / Virus Database: 216 - Release Date: 21/08/2002
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] 9 in the news
2002-09-21 2:01 matt
@ 2002-09-21 11:16 ` Lucio De Re
2002-09-21 15:21 ` Arnaud SAHUGUET
` (3 more replies)
2002-10-01 12:45 ` matt
1 sibling, 4 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Lucio De Re @ 2002-09-21 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 03:01:09AM +0100, matt wrote:
>
> http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/09/20/1532208&mode=nested&tid=156
>
Is it just me, or were the responses surprisingly uninformed?
++L
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [9fans] 9 in the news
2002-09-21 11:16 ` Lucio De Re
@ 2002-09-21 15:21 ` Arnaud SAHUGUET
2002-09-21 15:57 ` Jack Johnson
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Arnaud SAHUGUET @ 2002-09-21 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
The original article from LinuxWorld is a real mess.
They mix together so many different things and the title is really
misleading.
The /. comments are the usual stuff.
A lot of noise especially when the thread gets "hijacked" on a totally
different track.
But it is good PR for Plan9, putting it back on the radar screen of some
people.
This is called mindshare.
regards,
Arnaud
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lucio De Re" <lucio@proxima.alt.za>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2002 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9 in the news
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 03:01:09AM +0100, matt wrote:
> >
> > http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/09/20/1532208&mode=nested&tid=156
> >
> Is it just me, or were the responses surprisingly uninformed?
>
> ++L
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [9fans] 9 in the news
2002-09-21 11:16 ` Lucio De Re
2002-09-21 15:21 ` Arnaud SAHUGUET
@ 2002-09-21 15:57 ` Jack Johnson
2002-09-21 16:01 ` Ronald G Minnich
2002-09-21 21:55 ` Steve Kilbane
3 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Jack Johnson @ 2002-09-21 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Lucio De Re wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 03:01:09AM +0100, matt wrote:
>>http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/09/20/1532208&mode=nested&tid=156
>>
> Is it just me, or were the responses surprisingly uninformed?
I'm less informed than I should be, and I felt the same way.
I was unimpressed by the LinuxWorld article in general, but yes,
Slashdot isn't what it used to be.
-Jack
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] 9 in the news
2002-09-21 11:16 ` Lucio De Re
2002-09-21 15:21 ` Arnaud SAHUGUET
2002-09-21 15:57 ` Jack Johnson
@ 2002-09-21 16:01 ` Ronald G Minnich
2002-09-21 21:55 ` Steve Kilbane
3 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Ronald G Minnich @ 2002-09-21 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Lucio De Re wrote:
> Is it just me, or were the responses surprisingly uninformed?
It's slashdot. What else do you need to know?
ron
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] 9 in the news
2002-09-21 11:16 ` Lucio De Re
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2002-09-21 16:01 ` Ronald G Minnich
@ 2002-09-21 21:55 ` Steve Kilbane
3 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Steve Kilbane @ 2002-09-21 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> Is it just me, or were the responses surprisingly uninformed?
I'm surprised anybody bothers to read them in the first place.
Life's too short.
steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] 9 in the news
2002-09-21 2:01 matt
2002-09-21 11:16 ` Lucio De Re
@ 2002-10-01 12:45 ` matt
1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: matt @ 2002-10-01 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
er, looks like ntl's relay has decided to play a game
Received: from mta05-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.45]
by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id C741F19A68
for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 04:59:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from KIKE ([80.4.204.18]) by mta02-svc.ntlworld.com
for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 03:00:31 +0100
---
Outgoing mail is certified as idiotic.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.384 / Virus Database: 216 - Release Date: 22/08/2002
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-10-01 12:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-09-21 15:35 [9fans] 9 in the news rob pike, esq.
2002-09-21 16:33 ` Jack Johnson
2002-09-21 17:17 ` matt
2002-09-22 22:22 ` Dan Cross
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-09-23 14:38 Anssi Porttikivi
2002-09-21 20:28 Geoff Collyer
2002-09-23 14:13 ` Peter Downs
2002-09-23 16:00 ` Jack Johnson
2002-09-21 14:52 Russ Cox
2002-09-21 14:39 anothy
2002-09-21 2:01 matt
2002-09-21 11:16 ` Lucio De Re
2002-09-21 15:21 ` Arnaud SAHUGUET
2002-09-21 15:57 ` Jack Johnson
2002-09-21 16:01 ` Ronald G Minnich
2002-09-21 21:55 ` Steve Kilbane
2002-10-01 12:45 ` matt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).