Re: [9fans] function inconsistently declared

["Douglas A. Gwyn" <DAGwyn@null.net>]

C H Forsyth wrote:
> in old C,
>         f(a, b)
>         int a;
>         char b;
>         {
>         ...
>         }
> actual parameters for b were always promoted to int
> (since prototypes weren't available, and the compiler didn't maintain a
> file of the types of parameters to internal and external functions, it
> had to assume int for char, double for float etc.)

Actually it didn't *have* to, but it was convenient for the way
PDP-11 function linkage worked.

In the presence of a prototype, it is quite possible for the
compiler to use a linkage that differs from the one used for
unprototyped functions.  In this regard also remember that
use of a variable-argument function requires that the ,...)
prototype be visible; quite a few systems use a linkage for
that situation that is different from the one for unprototyped
functions.  I still occasionally have to fix up some legacy
code like:
	error("foo %d\n",1);	/* no prototype in scope */
	error("punt\n");
	...
	void error(char *fmt, int x) {
		... something involving &x
	}