From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3DC799F7.60204@strakt.com>
From: Boyd Roberts <boyd@strakt.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020623 Debian/1.0.0-0.woody.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] HTTP tunnelling of 9P -- taboo?
References: <9ac56b3938baa3accb55d587a63f662a@9srv.net> <00e601c28456$8810ee20$6501a8c0@KIKE>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue,  5 Nov 2002 11:14:15 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 159aaba8-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

matt wrote:

 > DAV transfers (well, HTTP transfers) are also more efficient than
FTP. You
 > can pipeline multiple transfers through a single TCP connection,
whereas FTP
 > requires a new connection for each file transferred (plus the control
connection).

Interesting definition of 'more efficient'.