From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\))
From: Anthony Sorace <a@9srv.net>
In-Reply-To: <EF906A2C-C7D6-4AEB-82B4-7546A6F51024@fb.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 16:24:52 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3E158C11-6ABE-452F-9400-BFA877CEE85D@9srv.net>
References: <EF906A2C-C7D6-4AEB-82B4-7546A6F51024@fb.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] kencc benchmark vs gcc
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1d906376-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

There have been many over the years (I think the original papers present =
something), but I've not seen anything current enough to be useful. The =
very short version: gcc almost always produces faster executables from =
the same code.