From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3E4166A0.8070305@nas.com>
From: Jack Johnson <fragment@nas.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.2a) Gecko/20020910
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Summary of Plan9 for jargon file
References: <9bbb3d829d428c918d69fef9531a3444@plan9.bell-labs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed,  5 Feb 2003 11:31:44 -0800
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4f62a778-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

Russ Cox wrote:
> i think this is what you're talking about,
> but it hardly seems a fitting entry.  also it's
> not true anymore, a fact i have recently
> discovered by crashing unix boxes with
> reasonable nfs traffic.  good luck crashing
> plan 9 with 9p traffic.

That's hardly fair.

Which crashes first, Plan 9 with heavy NFS traffic or Unix with heavy 9p
traffic?

;)

-J