From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3E4C28D8.3070506@ameritech.net>
From: northern snowfall <dbailey27@ameritech.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020518 Netscape6/6.2.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Speaking of routing....
References: <20030213152152.U50928@fbsd.cpsc.ucalgary.ca> <200302132314.h1DNEar23871@augusta.math.psu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 18:23:04 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5e3fce74-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

>
>
>I guess it's the 30-second timeout-tax I'm bummed out about.  I guess
>I don't see why, if I don't have a default route on the IP stack, it
>would take 30 seconds to realize that sending a packet out of that stack
>wasn't going to work.
>
It'd be neat if there was a way to alter the dial() performance
per-user. Maybe
via a namespace config, or, environment variables (within some kind of
restraint).
Don