From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3E5BCAA4.9000009@ameritech.net>
From: northern snowfall <dbailey27@ameritech.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020518 Netscape6/6.2.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] A proposal regarding # in bind
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302250750150.23620-100000@carotid.ccs.lanl.gov>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 14:57:24 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 728091e8-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

>
>
>It's also adding two "special" names (/ur and #) where there used to
>be one.
>
>So far the simplicity of # seems a bit nicer.
>
Agreed. A nexus isn't composed of multiple parts. A nexus should be just
that,
a single access endpoint. Though '#' may be "clunky" it works well and is
simple. I like the idea of device names rather than Runes, but, it seems
that
/ur /whatever and whatnots are even worse hacks over complicating the
issue, rather than creating a solid solution.
Don

>