From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3E5CD027.40808@strakt.com>
From: Boyd Roberts <boyd@strakt.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020623 Debian/1.0.0-0.woody.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] A proposal regarding # in bind
References: <70b1be7bf1a870538ecd7c40d8b83810@plan9.bell-labs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 15:33:11 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7315eb58-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

Russ Cox wrote:

>Here's a different proposal, also just an idea rather
>than a complete proposal, but perhaps worth pursuing.
>
>
Yes I was thinking of a similar (non file-system) interface
that provided a descriptor to access/modify your namespace.

Your idea certainly seems to be on the right track.

I would imagine that if it's a fd it could then be used
to pass a namespace to related and un-related processes.