From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3EB90F22.5070905@ameritech.net>
From: northern snowfall <dbailey27@ameritech.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020518 Netscape6/6.2.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] struct problems
References: <20030507043633.GX36080@cassie.foobarbaz.net> <3EB8B69D.5040107@ameritech.net> <006301c31488$b478f6c0$c901a8c0@cc77109e> <3EB904CC.9000303@ameritech.net> <000f01c31497$0a53d7f0$c901a8c0@cc77109e>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed,  7 May 2003 08:50:26 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: a18a3124-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025



Bruce Ellis wrote:

>pragmatism and a silly discussion over dinner.
>hj were dicks for assuming that they could
>lay out structs in an architecture independant way.
>we had to live with it.
>
Hey, I never said I *liked* the idea... :) but, thats how
it is...

>