From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3EC81C4E.9090501@ameritech.net>
From: northern snowfall <dbailey27@ameritech.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020518 Netscape6/6.2.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: Free Plan 9 "shell" accounts?
References: <20030518223330.8235.qmail@g.bio.cse.psu.edu> <02bc01c31d8f$04d1e820$e3944251@insultant.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 18:50:38 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b17579c2-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

>
>
>anyway, complaining to forged lines will just get the spammer into more grief,
>not less.
>
How will that work if noone knows the real sender and virii bots
are sending the messages. If you can't prove who is behind the
email, there is noone to legally target. Even if you can prove
a party probably sent a given spam, you still have the burden
of proving they were at the console that sent the original
message. That can't be done with the net bot movements and
other, older, forms of spamming.
Don

>