From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\)) From: Jeff Sickel In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 15:45:43 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3ECF6CAF-1E56-4E1F-A2EB-AEA58E036B3F@corpus-callosum.com> References: <5fc4ecdb1523a9dbda1829df0018500a@proxima.alt.za> <20131202183901.Horde.so34A23woqwLYjKomWz6Ag1@ssl.eumx.net> <74126e01b30ebb946afb3adcd8705e01@coraid.com> <20131202212426.0730342a@zinc.9fans.fr> To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Subject: Re: [9fans] Go and 21-bit runes (and a bit of Go status) Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8eb731c0-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Well, not Plan 9 per se, but APE, yes. APE was crusty, old, and not supporting the bulk of the POSIX APIs that all the current systems are using. So yes, changes to APE are required. On Dec 2, 2013, at 3:06 PM, Skip Tavakkolian = wrote: > wait! so, you had to make changes to Plan 9 to support Python? :) >=20 > (sorry, couldn't resist) >=20