From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3F27F259.4050502@nas.com>
From: Jack Johnson <fragment@nas.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030416 Thunderbird/0.1a
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] [off topic] HTML to PostScript?
References: <7b4d65d9026f619d185fb7baf8c02fd2@yourdomain.dom>
In-Reply-To: <7b4d65d9026f619d185fb7baf8c02fd2@yourdomain.dom>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:29:13 -0700
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0abd84ca-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

steve.simon@snellwilcox.com wrote:
> 	generate_raw_data | awk 'prog to manipulate data' |
> 		awk 'turn data into tbl/MS macros' |
> 		tbl |
> 		ms2html > report.ps

Wouldn't that be troff instead of ms2html?

Or:

	generate_raw_data | awk 'prog to manipulate data' |
		awk 'turn data into simple HTML' |
		html2ms | troff > report.ps

?

(going from the 30s of Google research -- sorry for any obvious ignorance)

-Jack