From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3F4D3436.4070401@proweb.co.uk> From: matt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030425 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] is sources unreachable? References: <3F4CD4E3.7010701@ameritech.net> <3F4CD0B3.6030607@proweb.co.uk> <3F4D2580.6040000@ameritech.net> <3F4D2973.4050803@proweb.co.uk> <3F4D3FC1.4040606@ameritech.net> In-Reply-To: <3F4D3FC1.4040606@ameritech.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 23:44:06 +0100 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2430cc6e-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 northern snowfall wrote: >> And also believe me that flaming you is the last thing on my mind. > > > > Lol, first of all I was just making a cocky joke. Second of all, I > understood > what you meant. Third of all, I thought you would have gotten the > parallel > to the "misunderstanding" on freenode. HAHA I have been trolled by f2f > Relax, sweet > > Don coming back to waste some time? There is quite a bit of conversation now (same old crap though A sucks, B sucks, C sucks less etc., nobody mention gcc