From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.1 \(3445.4.7\))
From: Francisco J Ballesteros <nemo@lsub.org>
In-Reply-To: <4a2509e89367a4b82ff129e12a561ddc@quintile.net>
Date: Sat,  3 Mar 2018 20:27:49 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3F51B445-6CA7-484E-9CC8-E0E16FA1E6A4@lsub.org>
References: <4a2509e89367a4b82ff129e12a561ddc@quintile.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Fwd: ubiquitous environment?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d1f39360-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Octopus would run on Plan 9, although we used inferno for (hosted) =
terminals, and it used Op as the protocol (a descendant of 9p like =
everyone else),
Plan B was more a modified Plan 9 system with name spaces replaced and =
the early ideas of the Octopus window system implemented.

No need to apologize, I'm glad you remember the system :-)
Thanks for your comment about it.

> On 3 Mar 2018, at 20:23, Steve Simon <steve@quintile.net> wrote:
>=20
> My appologies for misreprisenting your system.
>=20
> Would octopus run on plan9 or was the planB boxes or the
> streamlined filesystem api intrinsic to tos implmenetation?
>=20
> -Steve
>=20