9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Douglas A. Gwyn" <DAGwyn@null.net>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: SPAM: Re: [9fans] spam rejection after reception does have limits
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:21:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F784A92.84FDE48B@null.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ec0a9fbc1ea1ff7fca55c482a1c873e9@caldo.demon.co.uk>

Charles Forsyth wrote:
> but how can we know that that
> detection and prosecution didn't deter
> some, perhaps even quite a few, from attempting it?

The problem is, it just drives the worst offenders deeper into
the underground.  Drug trafficking and terrorism have been
targets of detection and prosecution, and overall this appears
to have made those problems worse, in some ways, than they might
otherwise have been.  Of course that's a judgment call, and there
is no way to perform the experiment to find out for sure.

I would prefer to see development of a social climate in which
it is so universally acknowledged that such attacks are not
acceptable that ordinary people take steps to stop it when they
detect it, instead of delegating the problem to government
agents.


  reply	other threads:[~2003-09-29 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-27 22:46 ron minnich
2003-09-28  1:11 ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28  9:08   ` Charles Forsyth
2003-09-28  9:16     ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28  8:10 ` Lucio De Re
2003-09-28  8:59   ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28  9:42     ` Lucio De Re
2003-09-28 10:18       ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28 10:50       ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28 11:18         ` Lucio De Re
2003-09-28 11:44           ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28 11:05       ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28 11:47         ` Lucio De Re
2003-09-28 11:58           ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28 12:17             ` Lucio De Re
2003-09-29  9:14         ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2003-09-29  9:37           ` boyd
2003-09-28 15:33       ` ron minnich
2003-09-28 15:39         ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-28 17:12           ` ron minnich
2003-09-28 17:22             ` boyd
2003-09-28 10:16     ` Charles Forsyth
2003-09-28 10:23       ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-29  3:23         ` salomo3
2003-09-29  3:32           ` boyd
2003-09-29  5:18             ` Lucio De Re
2003-09-29  9:18               ` boyd
2003-09-29 13:53             ` Joel Salomon
2003-09-29  9:14     ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2003-09-29  9:13   ` Douglas A. Gwyn
2003-09-29  9:44     ` SPAM: " Charles Forsyth
2003-09-29 15:21       ` Douglas A. Gwyn [this message]
2003-09-29 16:02         ` Joel Salomon
2003-09-29 21:24           ` boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3F784A92.84FDE48B@null.net \
    --to=dagwyn@null.net \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).