* [9fans] screen res, what's your maximum?
@ 2003-10-08 23:30 matt
2003-10-08 22:40 ` Scott Schwartz
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: matt @ 2003-10-08 23:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
okay, we all know of VGA hell, but what do people have as VGA heaven?
can anyone beat 1600x1200 at 24bpp ?
m
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] screen res, what's your maximum?
2003-10-08 23:30 [9fans] screen res, what's your maximum? matt
@ 2003-10-08 22:40 ` Scott Schwartz
2003-10-08 22:52 ` mirtchov
2003-10-08 23:52 ` matt
2003-10-09 0:28 ` [9fans] screen res, what's your maximum? Geoff Collyer
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 2 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Scott Schwartz @ 2003-10-08 22:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> can anyone beat 1600x1200 at 24bpp ?
Better have some nice, hinted, scalable fonts!
(e.g. Vera Sans Mono, which is free now.)
-- Scott (1024x768+glasses)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] screen res, what's your maximum?
2003-10-08 22:40 ` Scott Schwartz
@ 2003-10-08 22:52 ` mirtchov
2003-10-08 23:52 ` matt
1 sibling, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: mirtchov @ 2003-10-08 22:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> Better have some nice, hinted, scalable fonts!
> (e.g. Vera Sans Mono, which is free now.)
send them over for conversion if you have .bdf or .ttf. i'll put
them on ucalgary.ca's web for everybody to download
though ttf's are a bit heavy for today's graphics cards, they'll be
fine a generation later -- it's funny how Plan 9 speeds up with each
new piece of hardware, while things like Linux and Windows work
at the same percieved speed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] screen res, what's your maximum?
2003-10-08 22:40 ` Scott Schwartz
2003-10-08 22:52 ` mirtchov
@ 2003-10-08 23:52 ` matt
2003-10-09 0:27 ` vdharani
1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: matt @ 2003-10-08 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
i run anti-aliased fonts already & they look lovely
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] screen res, what's your maximum?
2003-10-08 23:52 ` matt
@ 2003-10-09 0:27 ` vdharani
2003-10-08 23:16 ` mirtchov
2003-10-09 0:31 ` matt
0 siblings, 2 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: vdharani @ 2003-10-09 0:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans; +Cc: matt
> i run anti-aliased fonts already & they look lovely
what fonts? and what screen resolution?
thanks
dharani
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] screen res, what's your maximum?
2003-10-09 0:27 ` vdharani
@ 2003-10-08 23:16 ` mirtchov
2003-10-09 0:31 ` matt
1 sibling, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: mirtchov @ 2003-10-08 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
this is a collection of extra fonts for Plan 9, mostly to add extra
glyphs that don't exist in the Plan 9 distribution. "freetype/"
contains code to convert .ttf fonts to antialiase Plan 9 subfonts.
all pages contain screenshots:
http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~mirtchov/p9/unifont/
http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~mirtchov/p9/efont/
http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~mirtchov/p9/freetype/
and a screenshot (not viewable from Plan 9):
http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~mirtchov/p9/freetype/cyber.png
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] screen res, what's your maximum?
2003-10-09 0:27 ` vdharani
2003-10-08 23:16 ` mirtchov
@ 2003-10-09 0:31 ` matt
2003-10-09 0:32 ` [9fans] fonts (was: screen res, what's your maximum?) Joel Salomon
1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: matt @ 2003-10-09 0:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
I converted XP's Lucida Sans using ttf2sub on Andrey's page
http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/~mirtchov/p9/freetype/
I had to adjust the line height but font(6) is a dream come true
i'm running drawterm atm.
AA fonts were a bit slow on a Duron 800 as CPU server but with the XP1700+ they have become usable in Acme too
http://www.proweb.co.uk/~matt/p9-4/screenie.png
m
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* [9fans] fonts (was: screen res, what's your maximum?)
2003-10-09 0:31 ` matt
@ 2003-10-09 0:32 ` Joel Salomon
2003-10-09 0:56 ` mirtchov
2003-10-09 2:09 ` Scott Schwartz
0 siblings, 2 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Joel Salomon @ 2003-10-09 0:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
matt@proweb.co.uk said:
> I converted XP's Lucida Sans using ttf2sub on Andrey's page
Arial Unicode MS might be a good font to convert - doubt that it can be
posted in converted form, but the font is available from ms
Also the code2000/code2001 fonts from http://home.att.net/~jameskass/
might be of use.
Thanks, Andrey.
--Joel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] fonts (was: screen res, what's your maximum?)
2003-10-09 0:32 ` [9fans] fonts (was: screen res, what's your maximum?) Joel Salomon
@ 2003-10-09 0:56 ` mirtchov
2003-10-09 2:09 ` Scott Schwartz
1 sibling, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: mirtchov @ 2003-10-09 0:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> Arial Unicode MS might be a good font to convert - doubt that it can be
> posted in converted form, but the font is available from ms
>
> Also the code2000/code2001 fonts from http://home.att.net/~jameskass/
> might be of use.
>
> Thanks, Andrey.
>
> --Joel
Yes, people are on their own when it comes to TrueType fonts. Unless
they want to use the Luxi stuff from XFree86 (I distribute those fonts
under the XFree86 license from the web pages linked to earlier),
they're obliged to obey the license the font comes with, or pay for
it. This is the reason why Charles Forsyth never distributed his port
of FreeType, which was done earlier than the stuff on my web page.
The most complete (meaning having the most UTF-8 glyphs) font that i
can find is Cyberbit, which used to be distributed 'free of charge'
with Netscape Communicator. Now google links to it have all but
disappeared, but you can still get it from their ftp server:
ftp://ftp.netscape.com/pub/communicator/extras/fonts/windows/Cyberbit.ZIP
It's a very large ttf file which, when converted with ttf2subf, should
suit most Plan 9 polyglots.
Just a small addition -- i didn't do ttf2subf and the truetype port,
it was Latchezar Ionkov.
andrey
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] fonts (was: screen res, what's your maximum?)
2003-10-09 0:32 ` [9fans] fonts (was: screen res, what's your maximum?) Joel Salomon
2003-10-09 0:56 ` mirtchov
@ 2003-10-09 2:09 ` Scott Schwartz
2003-10-09 2:35 ` rob pike, esq.
2003-10-09 2:44 ` Bruce Ellis
1 sibling, 2 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Scott Schwartz @ 2003-10-09 2:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
| Arial Unicode MS might be a good font to convert - doubt that it can be
| posted in converted form, but the font is available from ms
Not anymore.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] fonts (was: screen res, what's your maximum?)
2003-10-09 2:09 ` Scott Schwartz
@ 2003-10-09 2:35 ` rob pike, esq.
2003-10-09 3:16 ` Geoff Collyer
2003-10-09 2:44 ` Bruce Ellis
1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: rob pike, esq. @ 2003-10-09 2:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
i like the dell 2000FP screens. good value.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] fonts (was: screen res, what's your maximum?)
2003-10-09 2:09 ` Scott Schwartz
2003-10-09 2:35 ` rob pike, esq.
@ 2003-10-09 2:44 ` Bruce Ellis
1 sibling, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Ellis @ 2003-10-09 2:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
it is in the Microsoft Project 2000 Resource Kit,
and it is 23Mb.
brucee
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Schwartz" <schwartz@bio.cse.psu.edu>
To: <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 12:09 PM
Subject: Re: [9fans] fonts (was: screen res, what's your maximum?)
> | Arial Unicode MS might be a good font to convert - doubt that it can be
> | posted in converted form, but the font is available from ms
>
> Not anymore.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] screen res, what's your maximum?
2003-10-08 23:30 [9fans] screen res, what's your maximum? matt
2003-10-08 22:40 ` Scott Schwartz
@ 2003-10-09 0:28 ` Geoff Collyer
2003-10-09 1:42 ` matt
2003-10-09 0:29 ` Adrian Tritschler
2003-10-09 8:24 ` Richard Miller
3 siblings, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Geoff Collyer @ 2003-10-09 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
We used to run 1850x1440x24 at the labs, as I recall.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] screen res, what's your maximum?
2003-10-09 0:28 ` [9fans] screen res, what's your maximum? Geoff Collyer
@ 2003-10-09 1:42 ` matt
2003-10-09 0:55 ` Geoff Collyer
2003-10-09 1:54 ` jmk
0 siblings, 2 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: matt @ 2003-10-09 1:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> We used to run 1850x1440x24 at the labs, as I recall.
which VGA card, that's really why I'm asking
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] screen res, what's your maximum?
2003-10-09 1:42 ` matt
@ 2003-10-09 0:55 ` Geoff Collyer
2003-10-09 11:09 ` a
2003-10-09 1:54 ` jmk
1 sibling, 1 reply; 22+ messages in thread
From: Geoff Collyer @ 2003-10-09 0:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
Consulting /lib/vgadb, it looks like it was actually 1800x1350x24 or
1800x1440x24 (or maybe x16). This was two or three years ago, I think
it was just a common Mach 64 or ATI card. Any supported vga card with
at least 220MHz of video bandwidth and enough memory (5MB bytes for
x16) should be able to do it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] screen res, what's your maximum?
2003-10-09 1:42 ` matt
2003-10-09 0:55 ` Geoff Collyer
@ 2003-10-09 1:54 ` jmk
1 sibling, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: jmk @ 2003-10-09 1:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
On Wed Oct 8 20:39:52 EDT 2003, matt@proweb.co.uk wrote:
> > We used to run 1850x1440x24 at the labs, as I recall.
>
> which VGA card, that's really why I'm asking
As Geoff later pointed out, it's actually 1800x1350; I
made it up. I run it on 2 different Viewsonic P815 monitors
at work, one with some form of ATI Mach64 and the other
with one of the older NVidia cards. The font I use is
/lib/font/bit/pelm/unicode.9.font.
I'd willingly trade them in for those big Samsung LCDs at
1600x1200, they probably cost less now than the P815s did
when they were new.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] screen res, what's your maximum?
2003-10-08 23:30 [9fans] screen res, what's your maximum? matt
2003-10-08 22:40 ` Scott Schwartz
2003-10-09 0:28 ` [9fans] screen res, what's your maximum? Geoff Collyer
@ 2003-10-09 0:29 ` Adrian Tritschler
2003-10-09 8:24 ` Richard Miller
3 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Tritschler @ 2003-10-09 0:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
matt@proweb.co.uk wrote:
> okay, we all know of VGA hell, but what do people have as VGA heaven?
A card that works with plan9?
> can anyone beat 1600x1200 at 24bpp ?
Not quite.
I use an S3 card and 19" HP91 monitor at:
Windows 2000: 1600x1200x16bpp, 75Hz
Linux/Xfree: 1600x1200x16bpp, 75Hz
Plan9: 1024x768x8bpp, I *think* 56 or 60Hz, with an ugly blob instead of
a cursor.
Since the power supply here in the civilised world is 50Hz, screen
refresh rates of 60Hz are not particularly useful. The resulting 10Hz
beat frequency is quite noticable.
As an aside, what a lot of 60Hz folk have complained about over the
years of 50Hz being "too slow and flickery" for the human eye is more
often them watching 50Hz displays on 60Hz power supplies, and noticing
the same 10Hz beat.
> m
Adrian
---------------------------------------------------------------
Adrian Tritschler mailto:ajft@ajft.org
Latitude 38°S, Longitude 145°E, Altitude 50m, Shoe size 44
---------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] screen res, what's your maximum?
2003-10-08 23:30 [9fans] screen res, what's your maximum? matt
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2003-10-09 0:29 ` Adrian Tritschler
@ 2003-10-09 8:24 ` Richard Miller
3 siblings, 0 replies; 22+ messages in thread
From: Richard Miller @ 2003-10-09 8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> can anyone beat 1600x1200 at 24bpp ?
1600x1200 greyscale - I find text is sharper & easier to read when
there's only one dot per pixel (what's the right terminology?) instead
of three.
I use an elderly ATI xpert@work, and /lib/font/bit/pelm/unicode.9.font.
My VGA heaven would be a big greyscale LCD screen - do they exist?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 22+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-09 11:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-08 23:30 [9fans] screen res, what's your maximum? matt
2003-10-08 22:40 ` Scott Schwartz
2003-10-08 22:52 ` mirtchov
2003-10-08 23:52 ` matt
2003-10-09 0:27 ` vdharani
2003-10-08 23:16 ` mirtchov
2003-10-09 0:31 ` matt
2003-10-09 0:32 ` [9fans] fonts (was: screen res, what's your maximum?) Joel Salomon
2003-10-09 0:56 ` mirtchov
2003-10-09 2:09 ` Scott Schwartz
2003-10-09 2:35 ` rob pike, esq.
2003-10-09 3:16 ` Geoff Collyer
2003-10-09 4:04 ` mirtchov
2003-10-09 5:29 ` Rob Pike
2003-10-09 2:44 ` Bruce Ellis
2003-10-09 0:28 ` [9fans] screen res, what's your maximum? Geoff Collyer
2003-10-09 1:42 ` matt
2003-10-09 0:55 ` Geoff Collyer
2003-10-09 11:09 ` a
2003-10-09 1:54 ` jmk
2003-10-09 0:29 ` Adrian Tritschler
2003-10-09 8:24 ` Richard Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).