From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090417194357.GB3103@polynum.com> References: <57928816a76e769327ca134d7e28bd06@bellsouth.net> <404df7e5d05c5ae6057ea214164f0d0d@quintile.net> <20090417194357.GB3103@polynum.com> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:56:23 -0400 Message-ID: <3aaafc130904171256t462de117h229ccea3b33e5ea2@mail.gmail.com> From: "J.R. Mauro" To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan9 - the next 20 years Topicbox-Message-UUID: e35e5090-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 3:43 PM, wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 08:16:40PM +0100, Steve Simon wrote: >> I cannot find the reference (sorry), but I read an interview with Ken >> (Thompson) a while ago. >> >> He was asked what he would change if he where working on plan9 now, >> and his reply was somthing like "I would add support for cloud computing= ". >> >> I admin I am not clear exactly what he meant by this. > > My interpretation of cloud computing is precisely the split done by > plan9 with terminal/CPU/FileServer: a UI runing on a this Terminal, with > actual computing done somewhere about data stored somewhere. The problem is that the CPU and Fileservers can't be assumed to be static. Things can and will go down, move about, and become temporarily unusable over time. > > Perhaps tools for migrating tasks or managing the thing. But I have the > impression that the Plan 9 framework is the best for such a scheme. > -- > Thierry Laronde (Alceste) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 http://www.kergis.com/ > Key fingerprint =3D 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 =A0250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C > >