From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4e6ca2050907180138n10d83337v193e031bb56192b3@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4e6ca2050907180138n10d83337v193e031bb56192b3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 12:53:03 -0400
Message-ID: <3aaafc130907180953h1632d88dubac2bcc712167d7d@mail.gmail.com>
From: "J.R. Mauro" <jrm8005@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] channels across machines
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 25c59196-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Akshat
Kumar<akumar@mail.nanosouffle.net> wrote:
> The idea seems inviting at first, but have you
> given a thought to using plumber(4) for
> "interprocess messaging" (which is what you
> want, from what I understand)? This seems
> more appropriate for communication amongst
> processes alien to one another than something
> so code-level like a chan extension.

Acme does this.

>
>
> at least, in terms of Plan 9
> ak
>
>