From: Jorden Mauro <jrm8005@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9p resource sharing [was: Scanners]
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:17:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3aaafc130911281117p2727a5ddv2c7f9756ae03dd9e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EE5B83CC-BD55-421B-9C73-AA936B479482@fastmail.fm>
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Ethan Grammatikidis
<eekee57@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>
> On 28 Nov 2009, at 2:28 pm, hiro wrote:
>
>> It's also very easy to run my toaster diskless. Does this say anything
>> about it's elegance or simplicity? I don't remember what my toaster
>> has to do with 9p, but nevermind.
>
> And somebody always mentions toasters! Or coffee machines... :D
>
> Actually, yes it does say a lot about a toaster's elegant simplicity: a
> toaster only has parts to do the job intended. At a minimum a switched
> heater, a sprung sliding bread carrier which also switches the heater, and a
> thermally-releasing latch for the slider. I have seen a toaster without even
> that much complexity; it had glass sides so you could see when your toast
> was done how you like it.
There is a toaster that burns a picture of a raincloud, sun,
snowflake, etc. depending
on the morning's forecast. There is also a coffee pot you can control
via ethernet.
The coffee pot runs windows and there is a virus that causes Coffee
Denial of Service
on it.
>
> Actually there is a link here. Things to share are increasingly bloated, and
> applications strangely seem to need access to every feature of the shared
> entity. 9p could perhaps help by presenting a device model with files for
> different capabilities, or something like that, but it is only half a
> solution. OTOH perhaps the need to access device features is not really
> strange. Requiring a whole postscript interpreter on your printer could be
> seen as just as strange, it was certainly very expensive to do a few years
> ago.
>
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis
>> <eekee57@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 26 Nov 2009, at 8:53 pm, ron minnich wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 12:36 PM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> it is pretty hard to run windows, osx or linux without
>>>>> a hard drive.
>>>>
>>>> linux is actually quite easy and has been for about 12 years or more
>>>> ... not sure of the others.
>>>
>>> It's certainly possible to run OS X diskless, and knowing Apple it'll
>>> take
>>> less setting up than Linux. ;)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-28 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <<Pine.BSI.4.64.0911261033570.13404@malasada.lava.net>
2009-11-26 20:36 ` erik quanstrom
2009-11-26 20:53 ` ron minnich
2009-11-26 21:04 ` Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX)
2009-11-26 21:31 ` W B Hacker
2009-11-26 23:33 ` Enrico Weigelt
2009-11-27 5:31 ` W B Hacker
2010-01-13 16:41 ` Enrico Weigelt
2009-11-26 23:28 ` Enrico Weigelt
2009-11-28 13:33 ` Ethan Grammatikidis
2009-11-28 14:28 ` hiro
2009-11-28 15:42 ` Ethan Grammatikidis
2009-11-28 19:17 ` Jorden Mauro [this message]
2010-01-05 11:52 ` Enrico Weigelt
2010-01-08 14:44 ` Patrick Kelly
2010-01-08 5:29 ` LiteStar numnums
2010-01-08 15:29 ` hiro
2010-01-08 15:52 ` Patrick Kelly
2010-01-08 19:36 ` Taj Khattra
2010-01-08 20:03 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2010-01-08 21:05 ` hiro
2010-01-08 16:08 ` Jorden Mauro
2010-01-08 15:55 ` Patrick Kelly
2010-01-13 16:36 ` Enrico Weigelt
2010-01-05 11:49 ` Enrico Weigelt
2009-11-26 23:11 ` Enrico Weigelt
2009-11-26 23:28 ` matt
[not found] <<4B101734.7060102@maht0x0r.net>
2009-11-27 18:50 ` erik quanstrom
[not found] <<4B0F0F25.7020506@maht0x0r.net>
2009-11-27 2:21 ` erik quanstrom
2009-11-27 18:15 ` matt
2009-11-26 20:39 Francisco J Ballesteros
2009-12-09 23:18 ` Tim Newsham
[not found] <<Pine.BSI.4.64.0911261017560.13404@malasada.lava.net>
2009-11-26 20:25 ` erik quanstrom
2009-11-26 20:35 ` Tim Newsham
2009-11-26 21:18 ` W B Hacker
2009-11-28 12:51 ` Ethan Grammatikidis
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-26 0:07 [9fans] Scanners Charles Forsyth
2009-11-26 20:23 ` [9fans] 9p resource sharing [was: Scanners] Tim Newsham
2009-11-26 20:33 ` Tim Newsham
2009-11-26 23:39 ` Enrico Weigelt
2009-11-27 4:36 ` Tim Newsham
2009-11-27 5:30 ` Enrico Weigelt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3aaafc130911281117p2727a5ddv2c7f9756ae03dd9e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jrm8005@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).