From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <71b1e3b728efbd1b2a2ae2b5b4e2b1d0@coraid.com> References: <71b1e3b728efbd1b2a2ae2b5b4e2b1d0@coraid.com> Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:54:51 -0500 Message-ID: <3aaafc130911300754i7f244f02j7d161d907d7a8bed@mail.gmail.com> From: Jorden Mauro To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] =?iso-8859-1?q?gr=EBp_=28rhymes_with_creep=29_and_cptmp?= Topicbox-Message-UUID: a57202ee-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:32 AM, erik quanstrom wrot= e: > size isn't the real issue. =C2=A0the real issue is determining what > the ranges are for other than the base character. =C2=A0if a maps > to [aa'...] and z maps to [zz'...] =C2=A0it's not clear that [a'-z'] is a > sensible set. =C2=A0for example what does [e-f] map to? =C2=A0[e-f], clea= rly > but [=C3=AB-what?] > ``unfold turns a character, say =C3=AB into the set of characters that can be folded to the same base character. so ; unfold =C3=AB [e=C3=A8=C3=A9=C3=AA=C3=AB=C4=93=C4=95=C4=97=C4=99=C4=9B=C8=85=C8=87= =C8=A9=E1=B8=95=E1=B8=97=E1=B8=99=E1=B8=9B=E1=B8=9D=E1=BA=B9=E1=BA=BB=E1=BA= =BD=E1=BA=BF=E1=BB=81=E1=BB=83=E1=BB=85=E1=BB=87]'' To me, that sounds like [e-f] should be [e=C3=A8=C3=A9=C3=AA=C3=AB=C4=93=C4=95=C4=97=C4=99=C4=9B=C8=85=C8=87=C8=A9= =E1=B8=95=E1=B8=97=E1=B8=99=E1=B8=9B=E1=B8=9D=E1=BA=B9=E1=BA=BB=E1=BA=BD=E1= =BA=BF=E1=BB=81=E1=BB=83=E1=BB=85=E1=BB=87f=C6=92] iff e unfolds to the same set as =C3=AB. If e only unfolds to [e], then [e-f] would unfold to [ef]. Does that sound sane?