* [9fans] Rune update may have broken compilations
@ 2013-05-03 12:55 lucio
2013-05-03 13:30 ` David du Colombier
2013-05-03 13:43 ` erik quanstrom
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: lucio @ 2013-05-03 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
... or I may just be doing something inappropriate. But right now, I
get:
5c -FTVw runebase.c
f0 a4 8b
ae 20
f0 a2 a1
8a 20
f0 a2 a1
84 20
f0 a3 8f
95 20
f0 a5 89
89 20
runebase.c:1255 illegal rune in string
runebase.c:1255 illegal rune in string
runebase.c:1352 illegal rune in string
runebase.c:1352 illegal rune in string
runebase.c:1353 illegal rune in string
runebase.c:1353 illegal rune in string
runebase.c:1354 illegal rune in string
runebase.c:1354 illegal rune in string
runebase.c:1358 illegal rune in string
runebase.c:1358 illegal rune in string
runebase.c:1359 illegal rune in string
too many errors
mk: 5c -FTVw runebase.c : exit status=rc 137119: 5c 137121: error
mk: for(i in 9sys ... : exit status=rc 136165: rc 136939: mk 136941: error
mk: date for (i ... : exit status=rc 135760: rc 136100: mk 136164: error
when compiling libc, whether for the 386 or the arm.
I'd appreciate suggestions on how to get out of this trouble. I've
already made sure both 8c and 5c match the versions in sources.
++L
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Rune update may have broken compilations
2013-05-03 12:55 [9fans] Rune update may have broken compilations lucio
@ 2013-05-03 13:30 ` David du Colombier
2013-05-03 13:33 ` erik quanstrom
2013-05-04 15:32 ` lucio
2013-05-03 13:43 ` erik quanstrom
1 sibling, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David du Colombier @ 2013-05-03 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
The procedure is:
1. remove runebase from /sys/src/libc/port/mkfile
2. cd /sys/src/libc && mk install && mk clean
3. for(i in /sys/src/cmd/8?) {cd $i && mk install && mk clean}
4. add runebase in /sys/src/libc/port/mkfile
5. cd /sys/src/libc && mk install && mk clean
6. cd /sys/src && mk install && mk clean
--
David du Colombier
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Rune update may have broken compilations
2013-05-03 13:30 ` David du Colombier
@ 2013-05-03 13:33 ` erik quanstrom
2013-05-04 15:32 ` lucio
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: erik quanstrom @ 2013-05-03 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
On Fri May 3 09:31:11 EDT 2013, 0intro@gmail.com wrote:
> The procedure is:
>
> 1. remove runebase from /sys/src/libc/port/mkfile
> 2. cd /sys/src/libc && mk install && mk clean
> 3. for(i in /sys/src/cmd/8?) {cd $i && mk install && mk clean}
> 4. add runebase in /sys/src/libc/port/mkfile
> 5. cd /sys/src/libc && mk install && mk clean
> 6. cd /sys/src && mk install && mk clean
alternately, download /n/atom/plan9/$objtype/bin/$O^c
and goto step 6.
- erik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Rune update may have broken compilations
2013-05-03 12:55 [9fans] Rune update may have broken compilations lucio
2013-05-03 13:30 ` David du Colombier
@ 2013-05-03 13:43 ` erik quanstrom
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: erik quanstrom @ 2013-05-03 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
On Fri May 3 08:56:58 EDT 2013, lucio@proxima.alt.za wrote:
> ... or I may just be doing something inappropriate. But right now, I
> get:
>
> 5c -FTVw runebase.c
one thing not in the sources version of 21-bit runes is the
ability to regenerate the rune tables automaticly from the
official UnicodeData.txt.
the scripts in /n/atom/plan9/sys/src/cmd/runetype give one
that ability. since i had this same issue during conversion,
the scripts omit characters biggern than Maxrune.
these scripts made the conversions from 5.2 to 6.0 and
from 6.0 to 6.1 a matter of typing "mk".
- erik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] Rune update may have broken compilations
2013-05-03 13:30 ` David du Colombier
2013-05-03 13:33 ` erik quanstrom
@ 2013-05-04 15:32 ` lucio
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: lucio @ 2013-05-04 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 168 bytes --]
Successful for both 386 and arm, thank you, but on condition that
existing object libraries (lib*.a8 and lib*.a5) in the source
directories be removed first.
++L
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 4565 bytes --]
From: David du Colombier <0intro@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Rune update may have broken compilations
Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 15:30:14 +0200
Message-ID: <CANUoZoG36_jCoFcVbt3TkN6x4T8Upw2t9rTXw-Gf1x3Cm7kdLw@mail.gmail.com>
The procedure is:
1. remove runebase from /sys/src/libc/port/mkfile
2. cd /sys/src/libc && mk install && mk clean
3. for(i in /sys/src/cmd/8?) {cd $i && mk install && mk clean}
4. add runebase in /sys/src/libc/port/mkfile
5. cd /sys/src/libc && mk install && mk clean
6. cd /sys/src && mk install && mk clean
--
David du Colombier
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-05-04 15:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-05-03 12:55 [9fans] Rune update may have broken compilations lucio
2013-05-03 13:30 ` David du Colombier
2013-05-03 13:33 ` erik quanstrom
2013-05-04 15:32 ` lucio
2013-05-03 13:43 ` erik quanstrom
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).