From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3c40499ff07580eac92ecdf0d66c173d@collyer.net> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] pathetic From: Geoff Collyer In-Reply-To: <1375223f3c7bef6420b98302686aca19@plan9.bell-labs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:36:41 -0800 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 014f915c-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 I'd be happy to accept public keys for authentication, but don't yet have good ideas for how to get people to generate key pairs nor how to distribute their public keys. PGP hasn't taken over the world (though it might do a little better if Apple were to integrate it with their mail client seamlessly). I'm willing to trust the remote IP address of a TCP connection as identification. The tuple of (remote IP address, claimed From: address, recipient) should be enough to decide if I want a message, especially if software doesn't have to decide accept-or-reject while the sender is connected but has the third option of saying `hold it until the recipient decides (or 10 days have elapsed)'. For example, I know that mail from 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu *or* to geoff.9fans@collyer.net should come from 130.203.4.6 (mail.cse.psu.edu) only.