From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3c5e73a976eb4a5bbaa55be9d65c3e74@9srv.net>
From: a@9srv.net
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] v8 shell
In-Reply-To: <1068811476.1516.15.camel@pc118>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 10:03:47 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8a623e14-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

// I find the minor differences between TD's original and Byron's
// flattery are annoying, however. Will they ever be reconciled?

i can't speak to that, but what i'd really like to see instead is
just plan 9's compiled using rsc's port of the libs. there's a few
levels of tools dependancies, though, if i'm remembering right
from looking at that about two weeks ago.
=E3=82=A2