From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 15:31:21 -0400 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <3c65044566e4e7ba269a333861fb57ce@brasstown.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20130323100519.GA3980@polynum.com> <19750d1b50c54941f031f57dc4be456e@proxima.alt.za> <5099C9E8-C6E8-4B6B-A609-B5BDCA6C332F@lsub.org> <5C91EC08-2559-4DA8-B6F3-9293747EEFE8@gmail.com> <523540bfac9f8d6b4327f9abf6de7a88@brasstown.quanstro.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] gcc not an option for Plan9 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 31da8b5a-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Sat Mar 23 15:30:40 EDT 2013, robpike@gmail.com wrote: > so, assuming demand loading, this is more of a > disk space issue rather than a memory issue? > > It's only an issue on mailing lists and discussion groups. i was hoping to know if the symbols are used for reflection. - erik