9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sirjofri <sirjofri+ml-9fans@sirjofri.de>
To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Software philosophy
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 07:59:41 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3cdfcd26-b11d-4140-a9fb-cae0304e6ca2@sirjofri.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E28E3D3B-3483-491B-8F6E-BD46752C4BE4@pixelheresy.com>

Hello dear community,

I've read through many things in this thread and just want to add some 
two cents in a list format:

1) p9f (to my knowledge) never said anything about The One Plan 9. This 
was afaik the idea of some other community member, and I never heard any 
statement by p9f about that.

2) In fact, p9f is pretty silent, not only these days. This could be a 
good sign, as they let community be what they are, only occasionally 
taking part in it.

3) the p9f website promotes links to the Plan 9 archive software (V1-V4), 
9legacy as "Plan 9 with many useful patches", the RPi version and other 
Plan 9 resources. 9front is _never_ mentioned at all. It seems like they 
don't consider 9front as a Plan 9 system at all.

I don't know why, it's possible they just don't want it to exist or they 
don't know how to see it. It just hurts me personally as a community 
person who uses 9front and not the original Plan 9. And it's confusing. 
Am I even a Plan 9 user? The core OS principles are the same and most 
"shell" concepts also.

4) The split between original Plan9/9legacy and the 9front fork is 
reflected in a split between communities. David and the 9front core devs 
already showed that they are generally willing to share and accept 
patches and I never noticed any bad tone in their discussion, however the 
community is split up. And I don't think that we are so big that we _had_ 
to split up, there are other reasons, maybe historical reasons I don't 
know as a "fresh" community member with only ~5 years.

5) I really wished p9f would tell us more about their plans. It really 
seems like it's what we (9gridchan chat) feared in the beginning: a 
secret society. p9f is very silent, currently only seems to manage GSoC 
and nothing more. They told us they needed time to organize GSoC and 
themselves, but that was in january/february!

It's fine if they want to be silent, but it would be nice to see what we 
can expect from them. Currently it seems like they just want to share 
links to 9legacy and the archive and organize GSoC and hide the fact that 
9front exists.

6) p9f had a page about their purpose. It was like, they want to promote 
all Plan 9 systems and related technologies: 9atom, 9legacy, ... missing 
the (apparently) most obvious one: 9front. I couldn't find the page 
anymore. Other dubious sources can be found on the 9front /who/ site 
about p9f, where they apparently stole resources from 9front/cat-v pages. 
Very suspicious somehow.

7) To clarify: I don't want to see p9f as bad. I want to see them as a 
nice organization which is open for community efforts that need some 
official site. I want to see other community members/devs there, maybe 
one 9front contributor. I want to see them mentioning 9front like they 
mention other Plan 9 projects. I want to see p9f members open their 
mouths sometimes (which does happen) and take part in the community.

These are my wishes and notes, everything from my perspective.

sirjofri

------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T9ef6430f3025e731-Mc7a4815c52acb2ee56b20f23
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-19  7:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-16 11:15 [9fans] OAuth2 in factotum Demetrius Iatrakis
2021-08-17  3:48 ` Lucio De Re
2021-08-17  7:47   ` Keith Gibbs
2021-08-18  3:55     ` Lucio De Re
2021-08-18  7:02       ` [9fans] Software philosophy Skip Tavakkolian
2021-08-18  7:19         ` hiro
2021-08-18 10:15           ` Lucio De Re
2021-08-18  9:46         ` Keith Gibbs
2021-08-18 10:13         ` vic.thacker
2021-08-18 11:34           ` Keith Gibbs
2021-08-18 11:47             ` Lucio De Re
2021-08-18 23:44             ` hiro
2021-08-19  4:34               ` Lucio De Re
2021-08-19 10:44                 ` Keith Gibbs
2021-08-19 18:53                 ` Git & Conventional Browsers (Was Re: [9fans] Software philosophy) unobe
2021-08-19 19:00                   ` ori
2021-08-18 11:34           ` [9fans] Software philosophy Lucio De Re
2021-08-18 11:28         ` Lucio De Re
2021-08-18 12:02           ` Keith Gibbs
2021-08-18 19:33             ` leimy2k via 9fans
2021-08-18 20:09               ` David du Colombier
2021-08-18 22:00                 ` Eli Cohen
2021-08-19  7:08                   ` Keith Gibbs
2021-08-19  7:59                     ` sirjofri [this message]
2021-08-19  9:27                       ` Lucio De Re
2021-08-19  9:45                         ` hiro
2021-08-19  9:51                         ` hiro
2021-08-19 10:10                           ` sirjofri
2021-08-19 10:38                         ` Keith Gibbs
2021-08-19 11:45                           ` hiro
2021-08-19 12:43                             ` Eli Cohen
2021-08-19 19:58                               ` Aram Hăvărneanu
2021-08-19 10:56                         ` kvik
2021-08-19 11:33                           ` sirjofri
2021-08-19 20:44                           ` ori
2021-08-19  9:29                       ` hiro
2021-08-19  9:44                         ` sirjofri
2021-08-19  9:19                     ` hiro
2021-08-22  2:46                   ` kokamoto
2021-08-22  3:16                     ` Eli Cohen
2021-08-22  7:07                       ` [9fans] Drawterm GPU (was: Software philosophy) sirjofri
2021-08-22 10:04                         ` Frank D. Engel, Jr.
2021-08-22 11:49                           ` sirjofri
2021-08-22 12:24                             ` Chris McGee
2021-08-18  9:18       ` [9fans] OAuth2 in factotum Keith Gibbs
2021-08-18 12:10         ` Ethan Gardener
2021-08-18 15:23         ` Stuart Morrow
2021-08-18 16:58           ` Stuart Morrow
2021-08-18 17:06             ` Sigrid Solveig Haflínudóttir
2021-08-17 15:25   ` ori
2021-08-18  3:59     ` Lucio De Re
2021-08-18  4:20       ` ori
2021-08-18  4:42         ` Eli Cohen
2021-08-18  5:06         ` Lucio De Re
2021-08-17  4:13 ` ori
2021-08-17  5:43   ` Lucio De Re
2021-08-19  3:52 ` Kurt H Maier
2021-08-19  5:38 ` ori
2021-08-22 20:16 ` ori
2021-08-22 20:32   ` Demetrius Iatrakis
2021-08-22 20:38     ` ori
2021-08-22 20:36   ` ori

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3cdfcd26-b11d-4140-a9fb-cae0304e6ca2@sirjofri.de \
    --to=sirjofri+ml-9fans@sirjofri.de \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).