From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3d1b4126560a1275cfc5b04714fafe12@plan9.bell-labs.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] seek() in fossil?
From: "Russ Cox" <rsc@plan9.bell-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.51.0301261039070.55328@csb>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 14:01:15 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 47b993c4-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

I think 2^63 is a perfectly fine limit for the
forseeable future.  Do you really have files
(or file systems) that big?

The only point of the sentence about the 2^73
hash tree limit was that the maximum depth
of 7 is more than enough.

Russ