Re: [9fans] Okay, who's been playing with the cheese wiz?

[rog@vitanuova.com]

> I gave up on execnet a long time ago.  It's clunky
> and not clear that the interface should work that
> way.  What do you use it for?  (I'm just curious.)

for what it was used for, i couldn't see what was wrong with just
posting a named pipe to the command into /srv, assuming that the
command could serve 9p on its standard input.

in fact, it would seem to me to be a good idea to let all file server
commands serve 9p through stdin; then they can be mounted simply with:

mount >{command} /mnt/xxx

the command doesn't have to parse all those mount options or know
where it might be mounted, and you don't have to worry about
backgrounding it and then worrying whether it might not have mounted
in time.  (plus it's more versatile).

the original execnet stuff (assuming i understood what it was about)
could have been done with something like:

postsrv u9fs >{ssh ny 'u9fs -na none -u $USER -l $HOME/tmp/u9fs.log'}

(assuming the following command; maybe there is a similar command
somewhere else?):

/* postsrv.c */
#include <u.h>
#include <libc.h>

void main(int argc, char**argv)
{
	char buf[256];
	int fd, srvfd;
	if (argc != 3) {
		fprint(2, "usage: postsrv srvname file\n");
		exits("usage");
	}
	fd = open(argv[2], ORDWR);
	if (fd == -1) {
		fprint(2, "postsrv: cannot open %s: %r\n", argv[2]);
		exits("error");
	}
	snprint(buf, sizeof(buf), "/srv/%s", argv[1]);
	srvfd = create(buf, OWRITE, 0666);
	if (srvfd == -1) {
		fprint(2, "postsrv: cannot create %s: %r\n", buf);
		exits("error");
	}
	if (fprint(srvfd, "%d", fd) == -1) {
		fprint(2, "postsrv: cannot post %d: %r\n", fd);
		exits("error");
	}
}