From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3d9930aa542f29f26c3014fa5cf12f7a@terzarima.net> To: vester.thacker@gmail.com, 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] 64-Bit programming model. From: Charles Forsyth Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:31:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: <32a656c20509300431j6ab02b7cm7512019149d45a59@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-sqykolddtzqlrezdsxtlvfwdhr" Cc: Topicbox-Message-UUID: 925df4f6-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-sqykolddtzqlrezdsxtlvfwdhr Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit on amd64 it is: short is 16 bits, as before for Plan 9 int and long are 32 bits, as before long long is 64 bits, also as before pointers are 64 bits, not as before. (it's that last bit causes most of the trouble.) i think it must be LLP64 in your scheme --upas-sqykolddtzqlrezdsxtlvfwdhr Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([130.203.4.6]) by lavoro; Thu Dec 31 10:31:09 GMT 1998 Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 25409631F7 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 07:32:09 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id E7C97C6A06 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 07:31:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail.cse.psu.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (psuvax1 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 25489-01-22 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 07:31:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from qproxy.gmail.com (qproxy.gmail.com [72.14.204.200]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id 5EEC2C6A3E for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 07:31:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: by qproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q12so77664qba for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 04:31:45 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=DlYL0H+qiOAJL5ZJ6UHD+FbeVcYbxCxxLgZTx0OkZj90s7JQQaHUn4EpTkpPN1uFgrIt9VDj4BPaqXKb+vpG4mRkXSvuBaJIZPuGzSkOgNqZePudit8T5PmwX/qY2LbwnE/wybypPM9u5EKVb8qF/Ey29Sd8VCjatFOrbeUUwnw= Received: by 10.65.116.13 with SMTP id t13mr882859qbm; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 04:31:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.141.20 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 04:31:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <32a656c20509300431j6ab02b7cm7512019149d45a59@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 04:31:45 -0700 From: Vester Thacker To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cse.psu.edu Subject: [9fans] 64-Bit programming model. X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Vester Thacker , Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: 9fans-bounces+forsyth=terzarima.net@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-bounces+forsyth=terzarima.net@cse.psu.edu Okay, time for the "dumb question of the month". Concerning Plan 9 64-Bit support, which Long Pointer programming model is being used with Sparc64 and AMD64 ports? LLP64, LP64 or ILP64. Just curious. Forgive my ignorance, I am a layman and nowadays get my schooling though search engine results. --vester --upas-sqykolddtzqlrezdsxtlvfwdhr--