From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3da71b1c3631431f81d31e9eab88b528@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] disk/^(mbr format fdisk prep) From: Kenji Okamoto Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 12:24:45 +0900 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7a8b91f6-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 > I don't fully understand the concern. Right now, mini-box with CF and fossil > (without venti) on it is my only Plan 9 machine, standalone cpu+file server+auth. > What's wrong with fossil for that? Because none sayes about unstability of Ken's fs or kfs, but some do for fossil things. Of course some of them should be from wrong usage of it. However, I can't have confidnce that it's stable enough for our site. I'm using fossil+venti+cpu+auth server at home fully safely. However, its system is not loaded so high where only one user of myself all the time, and which is also said many times here. Kenji