From: David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan9port libdraw
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:16:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e1162e6050112161638f667e9@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2ed8faea462c30c5b8326b715bb522b1@terzarima.net>
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 22:40:29 0000, Charles Forsyth
<forsyth@terzarima.net> wrote:
> >>not be better for overall portability to move it to SDL? Someone
> >>ported Inferno to the Linux Framebuffer but I think if they had done
> >>it with SDL we'd have it for Carbon as well now.
>
> possibly, but having looked at SDL quickly just now,
> i'd say that if the framebuffer man had done that, it would
> have complicated things for me with Inferno: SDL doesn't just implement the graphics
> level, but everything else as well. it's effectively a plan9ports with
> a different programming interface: it has got its own threads,
> mutexes, events, ..., all of which i suppose get involved at some point
> when invoking the graphics.
>
Having actually written code and maintained another library on top
libSDL I'd say
that's not quite fair :). SDL isn't as rigid as you might think. Yes
sometimes you have
to lock a surface for direct access but you can directly access it.
That said, it's been years since I've done anything significant with
SDL and this wouldn't
be a bad way to get back into it.
Also the popular QEMU emulator doesn't seem to have problems with
using SDL for it's
purposes and it works on a lot of platforms too.
Let's see how far I get before we declare defeat.
Dave
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-13 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-12 21:13 David Leimbach
2005-01-12 21:23 ` William Josephson
2005-01-12 21:38 ` Russ Cox
2005-01-13 0:12 ` David Leimbach
2005-01-13 2:24 ` William K. Josephson
2005-01-13 21:21 ` David Leimbach
2005-01-13 4:52 ` David Leimbach
2005-01-13 5:05 ` Russ Cox
2005-01-13 5:08 ` David Leimbach
2005-01-12 22:40 ` Charles Forsyth
2005-01-13 0:16 ` David Leimbach [this message]
2005-01-13 0:39 ` Charles Forsyth
2005-01-13 17:33 ` [9fans] SDL on Plan9 was " Joel Salomon
2005-01-13 18:22 ` Steve Simon
[not found] <200501131459.j0DExSMn023614@skeeve.com>
[not found] ` <3e1162e6050113132167c99ec2@mail.gmail.com>
2005-01-15 19:18 ` [9fans] " David Leimbach
2005-01-15 20:00 ` David Leimbach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3e1162e6050112161638f667e9@mail.gmail.com \
--to=leimy2k@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).