From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3e1162e6050113132161591fc6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 13:21:38 -0800
From: David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan9port libdraw
In-Reply-To: <20050113022442.GC27142@mero.morphisms.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <3e1162e605011213134327baa2@mail.gmail.com>
	<ee9e417a0501121338218a5a24@mail.gmail.com>
	<3e1162e60501121612795e534e@mail.gmail.com>
	<20050113022442.GC27142@mero.morphisms.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2edd816e-eace-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:24:42 -0500, William K. Josephson
<jkw@eecs.harvard.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 04:12:25PM -0800, David Leimbach wrote:
> > SDL can use X11 as a backend, or the Linux framebuffer, or GGI or whatever
> > other backends they've implemented.
> 
> Yes, but I really, really don't want to have to depend on it.
> It is one thing to support and an entirely different thing to
> require it.  I use the Plan 9 ports in some pretty minimal
> environments where I don't want to have to pull in SDL.
> 
>  -WJ

I have no intention to remove the X support :).
>