From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3e1162e60509300818x3e3290f4he6d8dc6f2b64af80@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 08:18:21 -0700
From: David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 64-Bit programming model.
In-Reply-To: <3d9930aa542f29f26c3014fa5cf12f7a@terzarima.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <32a656c20509300431j6ab02b7cm7512019149d45a59@mail.gmail.com>
	<3d9930aa542f29f26c3014fa5cf12f7a@terzarima.net>
Cc: 
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 92625a78-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 9/30/05, Charles Forsyth <forsyth@terzarima.net> wrote:
> on amd64 it is:
>
> short is 16 bits, as before for Plan 9
> int and long are 32 bits, as before
> long long is 64 bits, also as before
> pointers are 64 bits, not as before.  (it's that last bit causes most of =
the trouble.)
> i think it must be LLP64 in your scheme
>

Basically "the same as windows 64".