From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3e1162e60510040822r7b118fc1rb74cc946cd036127@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 08:22:46 -0700 From: David Leimbach To: Eric Van Hensbergen Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: [V9fs-developer] playing with Tim's python 9p implementation In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <3e1162e60510031714y15fa11b0tf15a3bc314fe26e0@mail.gmail.com> <20051004120350.44AA61418FF@dexter-peak.quanstro.net> <3e1162e60510040741o75eab9f2q9e9c4854f1f93aaf@mail.gmail.com> <43429835.2000902@lanl.gov> Cc: erik quanstrom , V9FS Developers , Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 94e33218-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > I'd like to get a more-pure Linux auth infrastructure in place -- at > the very least being able to host auth servers under Linux, either > using Plan 9 ports or by porting them (IIRC: there were some unix auth > tools, but maybe I'm just thinking of netkey). There's also the > option of trying for a Kerberos or SASL auth mechanism for Linux-only > environments. This stuff just hasn't been a priority for me because > its not a concern in my environment, but its something we clearly need > a better story on. > Yeah, auth would be cool, but I don't need it for what I'm planning to do with v9fs either. Dave > -eric >