From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3e1162e60510051640s423891f2y538c01319965167@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed,  5 Oct 2005 16:40:55 -0700
From: David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: C H Forsyth <forsyth@vitanuova.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: [V9fs-developer] playing with Tim's python 9p
	implementation
In-Reply-To: <17359dff2944f0b6ab9858ace89d5cac@vitanuova.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <3e1162e60510040801y3dc3883ej7022f768fd544b4e@mail.gmail.com>
	<17359dff2944f0b6ab9858ace89d5cac@vitanuova.com>
Cc: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 952d3192-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 10/5/05, C H Forsyth <forsyth@vitanuova.com> wrote:
> >>works with plan 9 but it has it's own "/mnt/factotum" complete with
> >>the "ctl" file.... so maybe it's more complete than the documentation
> >>implies.
>
> i'd left that version in just for testing; now both factotum(4) and facto=
tum(2)
> have changed to reflect its existence.  of course, you haven't been able =
to see that
> because i didn't do a distribution pack in august or september, mainly be=
cause
> i was trying to get a few more things ready for distribution, on and off
> (including the new update scheme).
>

Ah, so is it true then that mount -9 requires a plan 9 factotum?  If
not then I'd say the man pages are a bit outdated.  auth/feedkey seems
to be pretty neat though :-)

Dave