From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3e1162e60601230944r6fd8f050ua9f7b9e395f119d7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:44:12 -0800
From: David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] fuse bashing
In-Reply-To: <43D5123E.1070001@lanl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20060123170614.07D331E8C37@holo.morphisms.net>
	<43D5123E.1070001@lanl.gov>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e413e2b0-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 1/23/06, Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov> wrote:
> In fact, fuse may be just good enough, and v9fs came in just late
> enough, that in the long term, fuse is what "wins" on linux, in the
> sense that most people may end up using fuse, since there are already
> pretty good examples for people to follow. We'll see.
>
> ron
>

FUSE also currently works fine on FreeBSD 6.  I have it here.

Dave