From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3e1162e60601231231r5e95b657x99e9070d17802734@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 12:31:22 -0800
From: David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] fuse bashing
In-Reply-To: <43D5123E.1070001@lanl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20060123170614.07D331E8C37@holo.morphisms.net>
	<43D5123E.1070001@lanl.gov>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e4482b60-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 1/23/06, Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov> wrote:
> In fact, fuse may be just good enough, and v9fs came in just late
> enough, that in the long term, fuse is what "wins" on linux, in the
> sense that most people may end up using fuse, since there are already
> pretty good examples for people to follow. We'll see.
>
> ron
>

Well are there differences in maximum file sizes exposable via 9p vs
FUSE?  I'd like to see more of a feature breakdown.

I don't know too much about the limitations of 9P... and this choir
isn't likely to sing them [no offense but it is called 9fans after
all]

Dave