* [9fans] gcc, kenc tidbits.
@ 2006-03-25 21:44 Brantley Coile
2006-03-25 21:47 ` Brantley Coile
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Brantley Coile @ 2006-03-25 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
term% size /bin/8c
228248t + 35040d + 35960b = 299248 /bin/8c
term% wc *.[chyl] ../cc/*.[chyl]
445 543 4119 8.out.h
1118 2627 16274 bound.c
56 171 903 bound.h
1839 4177 32120 cgen.c
2711 7014 45852 cgen64.c
206 580 3297 div.c
337 339 3227 enam.c
374 884 6418 gc.h
282 532 3975 list.c
90 159 1201 machcap.c
428 966 5535 mul.c
759 1720 11182 peep.c
1255 3167 20572 reg.c
842 1811 12833 sgen.c
647 1713 10943 swt.c
1415 3553 24215 txt.c
301 687 5314 ../cc/acid.c
89 155 850 ../cc/bits.c
761 1586 12048 ../cc/cc.h
1158 2844 15801 ../cc/cc.y
1164 2665 18909 ../cc/com.c
611 1455 9975 ../cc/com64.c
42 67 417 ../cc/compat.c
1628 4091 26723 ../cc/dcl.c
463 1038 7152 ../cc/dpchk.c
400 944 6167 ../cc/funct.c
1518 3820 23826 ../cc/lex.c
3 4 36 ../cc/mac.c
8 14 78 ../cc/machcap.c
268 620 4829 ../cc/pickle.c
597 1321 8606 ../cc/scon.c
1995 4982 33811 ../cc/sub.c
23810 56249 377208 total
$ size /usr/libexec/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.0.0/cc1
text data bss dec hex filename
4507518 43972 507932 5059422 4d335e /usr/libexec/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.0.0/cc1
$ man gcc | wc
10455 60731 610460
{How Boyd like to present evidence. There's just no substitute for Boyd.}
Oh, and a friend can't compile the new gcc on his BSD 5.1 box. The old gcc
doesn't like it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] gcc, kenc tidbits.
2006-03-25 21:44 [9fans] gcc, kenc tidbits Brantley Coile
@ 2006-03-25 21:47 ` Brantley Coile
2006-03-26 1:17 ` Jack Johnson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Brantley Coile @ 2006-03-25 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
> {How Boyd like to present evidence. There's just no substitute for Boyd.}
Dang! I can't even get that right! How UN-Boyd like to present evidence.
Maybe I should just go home. :(
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] gcc, kenc tidbits.
2006-03-25 21:47 ` Brantley Coile
@ 2006-03-26 1:17 ` Jack Johnson
2006-03-26 13:36 ` Bruce Ellis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jack Johnson @ 2006-03-26 1:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
On 3/25/06, Brantley Coile <brantley@coraid.com> wrote:
> Dang! I can't even get that right! How UN-Boyd like to present evidence.
He might have appreciated that someone attempted to be Boyd-like and
screwed it up.
Hi Boyd.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] gcc, kenc tidbits.
2006-03-26 1:17 ` Jack Johnson
@ 2006-03-26 13:36 ` Bruce Ellis
2006-03-26 16:54 ` David Leimbach
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Ellis @ 2006-03-26 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
I think Boyd would say "f*ck them, c*cksuckers" and he'd have a
rational explanation of other's stupidity over a kier and and a steak.
that's only my 25 years of "hanging out, drinking and coding" with him.
brucee
On 3/26/06, Jack Johnson <knapjack@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/25/06, Brantley Coile <brantley@coraid.com> wrote:
> > Dang! I can't even get that right! How UN-Boyd like to present evidence.
>
> He might have appreciated that someone attempted to be Boyd-like and
> screwed it up.
>
> Hi Boyd.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] gcc, kenc tidbits.
2006-03-26 13:36 ` Bruce Ellis
@ 2006-03-26 16:54 ` David Leimbach
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Leimbach @ 2006-03-26 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
On 3/26/06, Bruce Ellis <bruce.ellis@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think Boyd would say "f*ck them, c*cksuckers" and he'd have a
> rational explanation of other's stupidity over a kier and and a steak.
>
> that's only my 25 years of "hanging out, drinking and coding" with him.
>
> brucee
I thought for sure you were going to say red wine and chorizo. Then
again that might have been when he was eating "solo".
Dave
>
> On 3/26/06, Jack Johnson <knapjack@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 3/25/06, Brantley Coile <brantley@coraid.com> wrote:
> > > Dang! I can't even get that right! How UN-Boyd like to present evidence.
> >
> > He might have appreciated that someone attempted to be Boyd-like and
> > screwed it up.
> >
> > Hi Boyd.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-03-26 16:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-03-25 21:44 [9fans] gcc, kenc tidbits Brantley Coile
2006-03-25 21:47 ` Brantley Coile
2006-03-26 1:17 ` Jack Johnson
2006-03-26 13:36 ` Bruce Ellis
2006-03-26 16:54 ` David Leimbach
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).