From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <3e1162e60604101604x7c645ce5o5cdb85281610baab@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:04:18 -0700
From: "David Leimbach" <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>,
	inferno-list@vitanuova.com
In-Reply-To: <3e1162e60604101603y454703d2le4f4586b3ceba224@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <3e1162e60604101603y454703d2le4f4586b3ceba224@mail.gmail.com>
Cc:
Subject: [9fans] Re: Inferno's mk copy on Mac OS X vs Plan 9 from User Space
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3450b9d8-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 4/10/06, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:
> The mk that comes with Inferno "fails to fail" when building Inferno
> sources on my Intel Mac on Mac OS X.  The mk in Plan 9 from User Space
> doesn't appear to have this problem.

I should be more clear here obviously... When the compilation fails mk
from Inferno keeps on trucking instead of dying.  This doesn't happen
with P9P mk.

In fact, P9P on Intel Macs doesn't work right now it seems.

>
> Does anyone know of any specific differences between the two?
>
> I wonder if I could use P9P's mk to help me get through my recompile
> of Inferno for Mactels.
>
> Dave
>